Title

DEVOLUTION

'A really terrible time' for reorganisation

There is never going to be a good time for local government reorganisation, says Paul Shevlin. 'There is definitely a really terrible time and this is it.'

At the beginning of July, when district councils were in the midst of supporting local businesses and residents through lockdown and into the ‘new normal', a bombshell was dropped in North Yorkshire.

Simon Clarke, the then minister of state for housing, communities and local government, told us that in order to unlock devolution in the region, local government reorganisation was a prior necessity. In other words, we wouldn't get the benefits of devolution unless we created unitary authorities within North Yorkshire and York. And we were likely to be asked to submit proposals by early September.

Since then, the seven district and borough council leaders have been working to develop the best possible model for local government reorganisation across these areas, while maintaining crucial services for residents and businesses and supporting them through the ongoing pandemic.

The leaders have pulled together and put us in a strong position. If we are asked to submit proposals for reorganisation we have a model that is better than any of the alternatives and the evidence to back that up. Now, the minister has resigned and been replaced; we haven't yet been asked to submit proposals. It's also unclear when exactly the devolution White Paper will be published. One can hope that the Government recognises what we have known all along: this is not the best time to put local government through upheaval.

We're trying to help our communities out of lockdown and recover from the COVID-19 pandemic while dealing with the spectre of local spikes, a second wave, and winter, not to mention Brexit. There is never going to be a good time for local government reorganisation. There is definitely a really terrible time and this is it.

We recognise that devolution is important for our region. Local councils, together with the Local Enterprise Partnership, have drawn up plans to improve crucial areas, including transport, town centres, housing, digital infrastructure, business growth, and low-carbon projects. But we shouldn't have to reorganise local government in order to unlock these benefits. District councils are at the heart of the COVID-19 response and recovery. Devolution shouldn't mean a dilution of localism and it should not be dependent upon reorganisation. That's not the way to achieve the Government's levelling-up agenda.

Paul Shevlin is chief executive of Craven DC. He writes in a personal capacity

DEVOLUTION

Beyond the safety net: Embedding prevention at the core of social care reform

By Tom Stannard | 20 March 2026

If we are serious about building sustainable public services and improving outcomes for our communities, early intervention cannot remain a long-term ambitio...

DEVOLUTION

Company clusters: the key to success

By Vasant Chari | 20 March 2026

Backing high-growth potential businesses in the Black Country and elsewhere is vital for boosting regional economies, says Vasant Chari.

DEVOLUTION

Policing reform: Opportunities and challenges

By John Czul | 20 March 2026

Jon Czul says scrapping Police and Crime Commissioners will not, in itself, improve public safety, but that if the transition is handled carefully it could c...

DEVOLUTION

The process for fiscal devolution is clear and the deadline is real

By Mike Emmerich | 20 March 2026

Mike Emmerich says that while much remains unresolved, the Chancellor’s proposition to give local leaders a direct fiscal stake in growth was a shift from rh...