Title

WHITEHALL

Government tight-lipped on Thanet response

The Government has refused to disclose how it is responding to long-standing issues at Thanet DC following a request to intervene from its leader.

The Government has refused to disclose how it is responding to long-standing issues at Thanet DC following a request to intervene from its leader.

Council leader Ash Ashbee asked new secretary of state Michael Gove to intervene to sort out governance issues at Thanet in September.

Claims about a failure in corporate governance and a breakdown of good governance are understood to have been raised with the Government 20 months ago, when the then secretary of state Robert Jenrick was asked to intervene and told he should be ‘deeply concerned about bad corporate governance' at the authority.

The Local Government Association is also understood to have been made aware of governance issues at Thanet at the same time.

It said it was in ‘regular discussions with the council about ongoing issues and we will provide them with the support they request and need going forward'.

Conservative MP for South Thanet, Craig Mackinlay, said the issues raised in March 2020 were ‘extremely serious'.

A Government spokesperson said last year there was ‘no legal mechanism' for it to investigate but has declined to comment further.

Independent external auditor Grant Thornton, which was also informed at the same time, raised concerns with the council privately in July 2021 and issued Thanet with a rare Section 24 last month, when it highlighted ‘serious concerns about the ability of senior officers to work together' in a damning public report.

Director at Grant Thornton, Sarah Ironmonger, told an extraordinary council meeting last week: ‘The situation at Thanet does not represent good governance.

'We consider urgent action is needed to stabilise the situation and rebuild trust in the council from a residents', officers' and members' perspective.'

Green Party councillor Rebecca Wing said Grant Thornton's report had been a ‘harrowing read,' adding: ‘There was clearly no real effort or attempt made to address the serious issues.

'Indeed, they were allowed to escalate instead of taking action.

‘I cannot help but be shocked by the staggering amount of council taxpayers' money that's been wasted as a direct consequence of both the longevity and failure to act decisively and effectively according to repeated external warnings.

'Things have to change.'

WHITEHALL

There's no diluting diversity

By Emily Twinch | 09 December 2025

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage made it clear: he sees no need for dedicated diversity staff. Emily Twinch investigates whether councils that fell under Reform...

WHITEHALL

What does the Epping 'asylum hotel' High Court case mean for councils and planning departments?

By Ben Standing | 08 December 2025

After a council’s attempt to block asylum seekers from staying at a hotel was thwarted by the courts, Ben Standing explains what this means for local authori...

WHITEHALL

Future Forum North: Tackling net zero polarisation

By Martin Ford | 05 December 2025

A new approach is required to maintain public support for net zero projects, The MJ Future Forum North has heard.

WHITEHALL

Should citizens trust government AI without transparency?

By Ray Eitel-Porter | 05 December 2025

Ray Eitel-Porter says the UK Government is right to see AI as a driver of public service transformation and economic growth. ‘But these benefits can only be ...

Dan Peters

Popular articles by Dan Peters