Title

WHITEHALL

Centralisation is not a cosy cocoon

When Detroit went bust it seemed to prove the riskiness of local self-government, says Jessica Studdert. But Birmingham going into effective bankruptcy 'should end any naive assumptions the Whitehall model provides anything like a safety net'.

Ten years ago, the city of Detroit went bust. The combination of lost tax revenues from a declining population and rising expenses meant the city government effectively ran out of cash. A court bankruptcy was filed, triggering negotiations for adjustments in its financial obligations and state and federal support packages.

At the time, the reaction this side of the Atlantic was a combination of bewilderment and reassurance. Bewilderment at the US model of highly devolved Government, which left a big city in the position of not being able to meet its own population's needs. Reassurance that in our own highly centralised context, nothing like this could ever happen here. 

The episode seemed to prove the inherent riskiness of fiscal devolution and local self-government. Far better to be wrapped in the cosy cocoon of centralisation. What our own local authorities lack in autonomy, they gain from the security of a heavily controlled national system. 

Fast forward to 2023, and the picture doesn't look quite as rosy. The news that our second biggest city has gone bankrupt should end any naïve assumptions the Whitehall model provides anything like a safety net for local areas. Birmingham's declaration of a section 114 notice follows a string of other councils signalling similar dire financial straits. While each has its own circumstances, the wider policy discussion is slowly moving on from pathologising individual councils towards asking deeper questions about the degree of risk central Government is systematically placing on its local counterparts.

Demand pressures on services are rising – particularly in a city like Birmingham where 42%  of the population live in poverty. But councils must set balanced budgets and have little control over what resources they can access. Even Birmingham's reasonable request for a tourist tax to supplement the Commonwealth Games last year was refused by Government, let alone wider measures to generate the resources it needs.

While the US represents an extreme model of devolution, we must recognise our own highly centralised position. Both create unreasonable risks. There is a happy medium which combines sufficient funding to meet demand and the capacity to generate wider revenues. Let's keep this on the agenda. 

Jessica Studdert is deputy chief executive at New Local

X – @jesstud
 

WHITEHALL

Providing new homes for asylum seekers while tackling the wider housing emergency

By Tim Naor Hilton | 15 December 2025

If done correctly, a new system for housing people seeking asylum would bring fundamental benefits including new homes and investment in services and jobs, l...

WHITEHALL

APSE's annual polling generates good and bad news for councils

By Mo Baines | 11 December 2025

Highlights from APSE’s major annual Survation poll has found a divergence of views amongst the public and councillors on asylum accommodation and unwelcome ...

WHITEHALL

Tackling the debt tightrope

By Emily Whitford | 11 December 2025

Council tax arrears have continued to rise, says Emily Whitford. She argues that it’s time for a more modern system that delivers better outcomes and reduces...

WHITEHALL

Leadership capacity – the key to social care reform

By Nik Shah | 11 December 2025

Nik Shah reflects on a survey that finds confidence in social care reform is rising, but confidence in the leadership pipeline isn’t.

Jessica Studdert

Popular articles by Jessica Studdert