CHILDREN'S SERVICES

Aiming high to support disadvantaged children

Some charities and local authorities have been divided over the so called ‘exemption clause’ in the Children and Social Work Bill. Kate Mulley says the decision to scrap the initiative should not impact the pursuit of innovation.

There is much to celebrate in the Children and Social Work Bill as it approaches the end of its legislative journey.

By introducing a much needed focus on improving mental health support for looked after children, the Government has shown that it is listening to the sector. Nearly two-thirds of children enter care due to abuse and neglect, and the impact of traumatic experiences means that these children are four to five times more likely to struggle with mental health difficulties.

And yet much of this progress could go unnoticed amongst the noise around exemption clauses. This has been one of the few instances where some charities and local authorities have been divided, despite both having built their case with the best interests of children at the centre of their thinking. 

On most things, we agree. We agree we need to do better for vulnerable and disadvantaged children and young people. We agree this is difficult in the current environment, where need is rising and budgets are stretched. And we agree that in the current context all those delivering support to children must work differently and innovatively.

These clauses would have allowed local authorities to trial exemptions from children's social care law, with the aim of finding new ways of working. We support innovation but our view is that such extensive powers are not necessary for this to occur and that this was not an appropriate mechanism to address the challenges in children's social care. Such wide-ranging powers could have had the unintended consequence of making multi-agency, cross-border co-operation more complex for all partners. Complicating children's safeguarding is unlikely to improve outcomes. 

The Government's recent move to remove clauses 32 to 39 is a sign that they have heard these concerns. But their removal does not mean we should stop pursuing innovation, or stop trying to do better for disadvantaged children across the UK. The Innovation Programme, which Action for Children supports, has demonstrated significant successes within the existing legislative framework. 

The National Audit Office's 2016 report on children's social care found that there is no shortage of innovative good practice, but that ways of sharing this are lacking. Now, along with others, we hope that the What Works Centre for Children's Social Care will help address this gap: by sharing evidence-based practice and learning on what works. 

Kate Mulley is director of policy and campaigns at Action for Children


CHILDREN'S SERVICES

Reassembling the dragon

By Rob Thomas | 23 April 2025

Rob Thomas tracks policy debate on council reorganisation in Wales since 1996, and says the early work of a new independent group to explore how essential se...

CHILDREN'S SERVICES

The paradox of populism

By Michael Burton | 23 April 2025

When it comes to public spending, left and right are in agreement says Michael Burton.

CHILDREN'S SERVICES

Innovation that delivers

By Alison Griffin | 23 April 2025

For a Government hungry for innovation that delivers, the boroughs and all councils have much to offer, says chief executive of London Councils Alison Griffin.

CHILDREN'S SERVICES

Communities will judge us on the number of homes built

By Cllr Sam Chapman-Allen | 23 April 2025

If councils are given teeth to prevent land-banking and slow build-out rates they can help ensure the target of building 1.5 million homes this Parliament is...

Kate Mulley

Popular articles by Kate Mulley