CHILDREN'S SERVICES

Let austerity end for the children first

Rachel Dickinson says a host of conflicting policy initiatives are making it harder for councils to give children and young people the help they need.

Earlier this month the Commons local government select committee added yet more evidence to the national debate about the growing pressures in children's services. Helpfully, the committee made clear that the current envelope of funding for children's services is insufficient and endorsed our view that time-limited pots of funding for some local authorities, and not others, is not a replacement for a sustainable, equitable core funding for all.

Local authorities are ambitious about providing high quality services for vulnerable children, young people and their families but this is becoming increasingly tough. Our ability to improve children's experiences and their outcomes is being hampered by a sustained period of austerity, a 50% reduction in our budgets and rising levels of need in communities. There was a little respite in the autumn statement but again it was one-off funding which fell far short of what is needed. Moreover, the list of new responsibilities for us continues to grow and however welcome these new duties are – for example extending support for care leavers up to 25-years-old – they're rarely fully funded. On top of this, our existing preventative duties have never been sufficiently funded either, which only adds to the pressures we face.

Popular articles by Rachel Dickinson

SUBSCRIBE TO CONTINUE READING

Get unlimited access to The MJ with a subscription, plus a weekly copy of The MJ magazine sent directly to you door and inbox.

Subscribe

Full website content includes additional, exclusive commentary and analysis on the issues affecting local government.

Login

Already a subscriber?