Title

ELECTIONS

The blunt truth about voter ID

Paul Wheeler on why the Government's plans requiring voters to present identification upon voting are in danger of becoming a form of voter suppression.

Boxing Day – a special day when you can put your feet up after the excesses of Christmas. A great day for the Government to slip out controversial proposals for future elections.

Those involved with local politics have known for some time there was a problem both with impersonation and with the fraudulent use of postal votes. The blunt truth is a specific one that is, sadly, mainly associated with criminal elements in the Pakistani and Bangladeshi communities.

Sad too, that all political parties have turned a blind eye to such practices when it suited them. But these proposals are no solution and are in danger of becoming a form of voter suppression aimed at the young and those who lack ready access to passports and driving licences.

It is interesting that a request for date of birth details which would not disadvantage such groups has been ruled as a form of voter identification by the Government.

The suggestion to introduce compulsory ID checks for the 2020 General Election will be a logistical and legal nightmare for local councils. And guess who will be sued by irate citizens denied the right to vote? It isn't going to be the secretary of state.

The real answer is a robust application of the existing law rather than a wholesale change to the electoral process in this country. Those with long memories will remember that electoral irregularities in Hackney in the 1990s ceased when those involved were imprisoned. The question the ‘Pickles Review' avoided is why the modern-day police force and criminal prosecution services are reluctant to commence criminal proceedings even in the face of ample evidence.

Since the introduction of the universal franchise 100 years ago our electoral system has been predicated on the premise of encouraging as many people to register and vote as possible. There is no substantial evidence produced by the Electoral Commission that this long established trust-based system has broken down on a national basis.

If we are going to change the fundamentals of our electoral process then let's do it properly, preferably by a speaker's convention which can properly examine all the available information rather than a politically compromised proposal rushed out just after Christmas dinner.

Paul Wheeler is director of the Political Skills Forum and writes on local politics

ELECTIONS

Where is fiscal devo going and what is the agenda for Core Cities?

By Paul Marinko | 25 June 2026

Since the chancellor announced plans for devolved income tax the question appears to have happily moved away from ‘if’ to ‘when’. The MJ, Impower and Core Ci...

ELECTIONS

The pressure of reshaping the sector

By Mark Bearn | 25 June 2026

With many local government figures currently fighting on three fronts, Mark Bearn outlines the challenge of leading effectively while being pulled in differe...

ELECTIONS

A problem or a symptom?

By Anonymous | 24 June 2026

Repeated experiences among communications leaders in local government raise wider questions about leadership culture, accountability, authority and organisat...

ELECTIONS

Coming to terms with political balance

By Colin Mellors | 24 June 2026

Sixty-four councils had indecisive election outcomes in May. Colin Mellors considers the complexities of negotiation, the politics behind enhanced scrutiny, ...

Paul Wheeler

Popular articles by Paul Wheeler