Title

BUSINESS

Time for some breathing space?

The Government’s announcement of a call for evidence on a six-week ‘breathing space’ and statutory repayment scheme raises important questions for councils.

The Government's announcement of a call for evidence on a six-week ‘breathing space' and statutory repayment scheme raises important questions for councils.

While offering a breathing space (during which individuals would be free from interest, charges and further enforcement action) and accepting repayment plans are nothing out of the ordinary for councils, the inclusion of council tax and other debts in a statutory scheme would mark a significant change in control, and possibly raise some concerns among councils already feeling financial pressure.

The proposals may be attractive to some councils if they offer a way of ensuring that debt owed to them is prioritised for repayment. As involuntary creditors who need to ensure continued provision of public services, councils may feel that repayment of debt owed to them should be prioritised. The call for evidence defines priority debts as those that have the most serious consequences, however priority debts are defined differently by other parties.

In developing their understanding of income and expenditure, and prioritisation for repayment, councils may find spending time in debt advice contact centres a useful exercise in gaining insight into existing processes.

Councils may also wish to explore the central government opportunities available under the Digital Economy Act 2017, which paves the way for greater data sharing across government and with relevant third parties to help build a clearer view of an individual's income and expenditure. The development of new processes for sharing data would help to determine the appropriate action for each individual, a vital aspect of treating people fairly.

There remains an additional question for councils to consider: if the terms of a statutory repayment scheme meant that a debt wouldn't be repaid in-year, and that arrears would continue to build, should councils be prevented from seeking repayment through taking control of goods? Enforcement action is a last resort for councils, but if an individual may have assets that could resolve their debt issues, what would be the appropriate course of action?

There are of course no simple answers when it comes to the matter of resolving debt, but councils will benefit from fully engaging with the development of the breathing space and repayment scheme, to ensure their questions are answered, and their voice is heard.

This column is brought to you by Marston Holdings

Pamela Mulcahy is communications and policy director at Marston Holdings

BUSINESS

Rethinking the Better Care Fund

By Mark Palethorpe | 22 April 2026

Moving integrated care from rhetoric to reality calls for an urgent review of how resources like the Better Care Fund are structured, governed and deployed, ...

BUSINESS

How we delivered the Youth Investment Fund in Blackburn with Darwen

By Imran Akuji | 21 April 2026

Delivering the Youth Investment Fund in Blackburn with Darwen required a deliberate shift in the council’s role from lead applicant to system steward, says I...

BUSINESS

'One size fits all' rules for the Government when it comes to planning committees

By Ian Miller | 20 April 2026

Setting 13 as the maximum size of planning committees might suit district councils, says Ian Miller. ‘But it means planning will be the preserve of only a sm...

BUSINESS

Fiscal devolution: A test of seriousness for government and places

By Mike Emmerich | 20 April 2026

If government and mayoral strategic authorities are willing to match fiscal responsibility and the retention of the proceeds of growth within agreed paramete...