Title

PLANNING

Councils clash over green belt housing

South Bucks DC has criticised its southern neighbours Slough Council for publishing proposals to build on green belt land within its boundary.

South Bucks DC has criticised its southern neighbours Slough Council for publishing proposals to build on green belt land within its boundary.

Slough published a draft report outlining plans to build a garden suburb in rural South Bucks, which the district council did not want published.

Paul Simpson, from Slough's planning department, said: ‘What we've done now is purely publish for information a draft report by our consultants - not endorsed by us - just showing how this development could take place so that we can have a proper grown-up discussion about it and begin to engage the landowners, as well as other interested parties.

‘We know it's in the green belt. We know we shall have to show very special circumstances. We'll do that at a later stage.'

Mr Simpson stressed that there was no room within Slough's urban area for more housing, particularly in light of the projected third Heathrow runway and other town centre developments.

But South Bucks' disappointed deputy leader, Cllr Nick Naylor, said: ‘This report has been published against our better advice.

‘It could totally mislead readers and give them an entirely incorrect impression that Slough Council has found a solution to its housing need shortfall in South Bucks. It has not.

‘There is no evidence to support Slough Council or Atkins' position while South Bucks DC has appropriately considered a northern extension option and has rejected it based on our own sound evidence and national planning policy.

‘We will, under the duty to co-operate, continue to work with Slough to help them find a solution to their housing needs where we can, but all evidence, to date, points to the fact a northern extension of Slough cannot be the answer.

‘That being the case, South Bucks members will continue to vigorously defend this strategic part of our green belt and protect this area from inappropriate development.'

PLANNING

The cracks that threaten integrated care

By Matthew Taylor | 04 December 2025

Groundbreaking investigation by The MJ and its sister title Healthcare Management reveal a stark and escalating crisis: Integrated Care Boards collectively o...

PLANNING

EXCLUSIVE: Tower Hamlets improving but risk of 'optimism bias'

By Paul Marinko | 04 December 2025

Tower Hamlets LBC has improved and continues to show ‘strong financial management’ but a tendency toward ‘optimism bias’ remains, according to a sector-led p...

PLANNING

Putting the focus on Impact

By Adrianna Partridge | 04 December 2025

Mark Minion and Adrianna Partridge explain the benefits South Oxfordshire DC and Vale of White Horse DC have gained from supporting the Local Government Asso...

PLANNING

Go North!

By Zoe Billingham | 04 December 2025

This Budget makes one thing clear: the Government is throwing its weight behind the North. Zoë Billingham unpacks the gains for England’s overlooked regions.

Popular articles by William Eichler