FINANCE

Devolution may be sexier, but funding reform is vital

David Phillips says that In the excitement about devolution, it is vital not to forget another big issue facing England: the lack of a proper system for allocating funding between councils

© Talaj / Shutterstock.com

Ten days into her job, the deputy prime minister Angela Rayner wrote to local government leaders  promising ‘the most ambitious programme of devolution this country [England] has ever seen'. The new Government plans to devolve powers over, and funding for, transport, skills, housing, planning and employment support, that some of the mayors of combined authorities have, to more areas of England. It also plans for more areas to receive funding for such responsibilities via a ‘single pot' that they are free to allocate as they see fit, rather than use a plethora of ring-fenced grants as is now usually the case. More generally, all councils will benefit from multi-year as opposed to single-year funding settlements.

These plans can be described as ambitious only in the context of England's highly centralised governance arrangements: local governments in other large, developed economies often have more flexibility over spending and particularly revenue than their English counterparts. But they're a start. And a growing number of voices are calling for the devolution of additional revenue streams to accompany these changes on the spending side of the budget. This includes voices within local government (such as the Northern Powerhouse, and London Finance Commission ), and think tanks (such as the Centre for Cities  and LGIU) .

Popular articles by David Phillips

SUBSCRIBE TO CONTINUE READING

Get unlimited access to The MJ with a subscription, plus a weekly copy of The MJ magazine sent directly to you door and inbox.

Subscribe

Full website content includes additional, exclusive commentary and analysis on the issues affecting local government.

Login

Already a subscriber?