Title

HOUSING

Housing safety and services under scrutiny

Catherine Little looks at the early lessons to be taken from new social housing regulations.

© Clare Louise Jackson / Shutterstock.com

© Clare Louise Jackson / Shutterstock.com

The Regulator of Social Housing has now published 42 of the new consumer grades: 23 housing association and 19 local authority. Serious weaknesses have been found in 35% of cases, almost all as a result of reactive engagement and all but two with local authorities.

It's still early days, but a number of patterns are emerging through the regulatory judgements. There are no real surprises – tenant safety is front and centre of the regulator's mind, along with the need to understand stock condition and to meet service standards.

The number of C1 judgements to date is higher than we might have expected from the regulatory narrative as the standards were published, and it is positive to see that some providers have really got hold of the expectations.

The real eye openers are the C3 and C4 judgements, where serious weaknesses have been found in the basics of safety compliance, in data quality and integrity, in the provision of services, handling of complaints and the lack of meaningful tenant engagement and scrutiny. By any measure, these are pretty damning verdicts.

It is clear most social landlords are engaging with the regulatory regime and putting improvements in place, many in the face of pressing financial and operational difficulties. While the regulator reserves the right to use its extensive range of intervention and enforcement powers, there is a window for landlords to get hold of issues and put improvements in place.

Our three main observations from work with councils and registered providers across the country are:

1. The council or board needs to have assurance of regulatory compliance. Landlords with robust frameworks – including clear reporting, effective oversight, and rigorous checks – will be best positioned to demonstrate this co-regulatory spirit.

2. The quality and integrity of data is central to many of the regulatory standards. It is not enough to see high performance, the governing body needs to have confidence in the validity of the information they review.

3. Culture is absolutely central to meeting the standards in terms of centring tenants' safety, homes, services and voices.

Campbell Tickell provides services including critical friend, inspection preparations and regulatory recovery. Please contact Catherine Little at catherine.little@campbelltickell.com for more details of these.

HOUSING

The severed links in health and care integration

By Martin Ford | 06 August 2026

Despite recognition of the benefits of closer integration between health and social care, recent months have seen a flurry of breakups in partnerships betwee...

HOUSING

Embedding the conditions for successful care collaboration

By Aidan Rave | 06 August 2026

Health and care integration hasn’t failed, we just don’t yet take it seriously enough, argues Aidan Rave.

HOUSING

Building the workforce for tomorrow's councils

By Chantelle Wooldridge | 06 August 2026

The councils best placed to succeed will be those that invest in their people from the outset, recognising that leadership, culture and capability are the fo...

HOUSING

How data and community voice are shaping Luton's climate future

By Leonie Taylor | 03 August 2026

Senior researcher Leonie Taylor shares her experiences of The Young Foundation’s work with Luton BC, mapping a fair path to net zero.