LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION

LGA review should show us warts and all

I am a huge supporter of the Local Government Association but it struggles to speak with one voice when it is criticising its own, writes Heather Jameson.

I am a huge supporter of the Local Government Association.

I absolutely believe that the local government world is a better place for having a single voice – and I am in favour of most of what it does.

As the Peer Review points out, if the LGA didn't exist, we would have to invent it.

The report does a great job of highlighting some of the best bits of the LGA and it claims the Graph of Doom, 100 days, and Rewiring Local Government reports showcase local government lobbying at its best.

However, the report is balanced – if somewhat politely.

It doesn't scrimp on highlighting the problems – some of which are inherent in the nature of the organisation.

It acknowledges that its diversity and consensus are its greatest strength and its greatest weakness.

On sector-led improvement, the Peer Review suggests the LGA needs to make reviews harder-hitting, intervene even where they are not wanted, and speak out against service failure.

The current consultation may provide some answers.

But as an association, reliant on subscriptions and consensus, the LGA struggles to speak with one voice when it is criticising its own and fails to bite the hands that feeds it.

The report is no doubt beautifully drafted to balance the criticisms with the praise – but they are there.

My understanding is that it was drafted several times in the six weeks between the initial findings and the final report – but I am told that was the LGA's opportunity to feed back.

What concerns me is the LGA comment on the report – which highlights the positives but fails to acknowledge any problems.

The review was initiated after Labour group leader Jim McMahon came into post last July – yet it was only conducted in January and only reporting now.

It smacks of a body dragging its heels.

For an organisation which peer reviews councils, and which is considering making reviews mandatory, I would have liked to have seen all the warts as the LGA showed local government just how Peer Reviews should be done.

But, as Cllr McMahon has suggested, what happens next will be the real test.

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION

Boost mayors, not boroughs

By Greg Clark | 17 April 2025

Greg Clark says the ‘feeble’ powers of our mayors are due for an upgrade to deliver decisive change.

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION

The outlook for Reform

By Paul Marinko | 17 April 2025

Paul Marinko finds that many share the view that Reform are going to do well in next month’s local elections. But what is likely to happen once they gain sea...

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION

Surrey urged to include single unitary proposal

By Paul Marinko and Heather Jameson | 17 April 2025

The Government has urged Surrey to provide costings for a single unitary authority in its final reorganisation plans despite its councils having rejected thi...

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION

The benefits of investing in leadership

By Steve Wilson | 17 April 2025

Steve Wilson discusses the state of leadership development within the sector and highlights the need for full support when transitioning to leadership roles.

Heather Jameson

Popular articles by Heather Jameson