INNOVATION

Will Oflog stifle innovation?

Chief executive officer of Norse Group Justin Galliford considers the impact the new watchdog will have on local government.

The stated vision for the Office for Local Government (Oflog) is ‘To provide authoritative and accessible data and analysis about the performance of local government, and support its improvement.'

It has additionally claimed it will empower citizens to hold local leaders to account, while supporting those same local leaders looking to innovate and drive self-improvement.

In recent discussions with local authority heads, I have detected cross-party scepticism, raising concerns that this new watchdog will pile further pressure on councils and make them more risk averse.

While risk aversion may save some councils from the high-profile failures seen in the likes of Croydon, Woking and Thurrock, it can also inhibit the innovation in service delivery that is so vital in times of financial pressure. It is far easier to adopt a ‘safety-first mindset which means, in practice, sticking with an unsustainable status quo' as Adam Lent, chief executive of the think-tank New Local, wrote earlier this year.

Greater transparency and in-depth analysis of the performance of local government is of course a laudable aim. However, the requirements for data collection must not be so onerous that they increase the burden which already adversely affects councils' day to day ability to deliver services in line with local residents' expectations.

In my experience the majority of councils have taken a responsible approach to balancing finances and services; their ability to achieve a consistently high standard of delivery, in the face of the unprecedented pressures of the last few years, has been impressive.

At Norse we work in partnership with more than 20 local authorities, who have adapted to the changing economic environment, and ever-rising resident expectations. I have seen our partners making difficult decisions, working hard to ensure that services are maintained and budgets balanced. With their local knowledge they are best placed to understand what needs to be done, and the appropriate levels of risk; and I am concerned the extra scrutiny from Oflog might inhibit council leaders and compromise the innovation that we need to meet future challenges.

Justin Galliford is Chief Executive Officer of Norse Group

www.norsepartnerships.co.uk

This article is sponsored content for The MJ

INNOVATION

Reorganisation must be underpinned by honesty

By David Brown | 20 April 2025

Reorganisation requires clear, cogent policy set in a consistent framework, says David Brown. 'Additional reflections create uncertainty for our staff, membe...

INNOVATION

The outlook for Reform

By Paul Marinko | 17 April 2025

Paul Marinko finds that many share the view that Reform are going to do well in next month’s local elections. But what is likely to happen once they gain sea...

INNOVATION

Surrey urged to include single unitary proposal

By Paul Marinko and Heather Jameson | 17 April 2025

The Government has urged Surrey to provide costings for a single unitary authority in its final reorganisation plans despite its councils having rejected thi...

INNOVATION

Prioritising financial probity in a time of flux

By Amardeep Gill | 17 April 2025

Audit, government and scrutiny must be reformed and renewed alongside reorganisation or the risk remains of larger-scale council financial failures, say Jona...

Popular articles by Justin Galliford