Title

WHITEHALL

PAC: Government overstated Troubled Families effectiveness

The Government has ‘overstated’ the effectiveness of its Troubled Families programme and been ‘evasive’ in its dealings with MPs, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has said.

The Government has ‘overstated' the effectiveness of its Troubled Families programme and been ‘evasive' in its dealings with MPs, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has said today.

The Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) considered families to be ‘turned around' on the basis of short-term outcomes rather than ‘long-term, sustainable change in families' lives,' the committee found. 

MPs also argued that the Government's claim the programme had saved £1.2bn was an ‘overstatement'.

The PAC report also chastised the Government for delaying the publication of the programme's phase one evaluation.

‘The department was evasive when explaining the reasons for this delay, furthering the impression that government is reluctant to be open and transparent about the Troubled Families programme,' the PAC said.

The committee also urged the DCLG to review its use of payment by results, which it claimed led ‘some councils attempting to move families through the programme quickly, potentially at the expense of reduced quality of support'.

PAC chair Meg Hiller said: ‘Government officials might be inclined to consider our comments on the delay in publishing its Troubled Families evaluation as a slap on the wrist about Whitehall bureaucracy.

‘Let me assure them that given the ambitions for this programme, the implications for families and the significant sums of money invested, it is far more serious than that.'

Senior civil servants have defended their work, telling the PAC there had been improvements in 116,000 families but it was difficult to prove ‘beyond statistical doubt' that success could be ascribed to the programme.

A government spokesman said: 'As the PAC report recognises, the Troubled Families programme enabled local authorities to expand and transform the way local services work with families.

'But, of course, there will always be lessons to learn and we have already made significant improvements to the second stage of the programme.

'We will look carefully at the evidence to find out how we can improve the programme further to help some of the most vulnerable people in our society.'

 

WHITEHALL

Local government now has clarity and a credible way forward on SEND

By Rob Powell | 10 February 2026

Rob Powell says he is ‘relieved and pleased that we now have a meaningful solution’ to English councils’ deficits relating to special educational needs and d...

WHITEHALL

The Top 10 councils powering ahead on productivity

By Ann McGauran | 05 February 2026

Local government’s leadership may be dealing with a maelstrom of challenges, but the councils whose productivity performance has earned them a place in the I...

WHITEHALL

Trashing the new burdens local government funding doctrine

By Ian Miller | 03 February 2026

There seems no proof yet that a penny has been added to the local government settlement to meet the ‘massive’ new burden of meeting the statutory duty for we...

WHITEHALL

Political convenience is no justification for unconstitutional local election tinkering

By Colin Copus | 02 February 2026

The Government’s decision to ‘postpone or cancel’ local elections is ‘a travesty of constitutional propriety’ say emeritus professors Steve Leach and Colin C...

Popular articles by William Eichler