Title

SOCIAL CARE

Paying the price for Government's mixed messages

In a 'killer blow' Jenrick has issued his caveat, says Heather Jameson. The Government will only pay for the ‘specific tasks’ it has handed down in relation to COVID-19. 'This is not just penny pinching, it is playing with people’s lives', she adds.

When historians judge the Government's response to the coronavirus crisis they will, quite rightly, focus on the human cost. The soaring death rates – with all the devastation, grief and loss that brings – will be examined.

The Government guidance, delays to lockdown and the farcical distribution of PPE will all be in the spotlight.

It is doubtful that local government finance will take centre stage in the history books but the latest missives from communities secretary Robert Jenrick are likely to have a devastating impact on the UK's people and economy for years – if not decades – to come.

Central government's mixed messages on local government funding have not just been chaotic, they have been catastrophic. Go back just a few weeks and the lines were clear. ‘Whatever it takes'.

Privately, ministers reassured: if you are close to financial collapse, come to us.

Local government was handed the responsibility to look after its communities – it is what the sector is there for. Now, in a killer blow, Mr Jenrick has issued his caveat. The Government will only pay for the ‘specific tasks' it has handed down.

That means no support for lost income. No funding for further pressures on services – from social care, to domestic abuse, to protecting those with lost income. No cash to support the local economy, rebuild town centres, create growth, jobs and skills. The list of costs – after a decade of cuts – is endless.

So surely this means a raft of s114 notices – councils declaring themselves to be out of cash. There may be threats, but here's the rub: a s114 is not just raising the flag on your finances, giving in on trying to balance the books; it is a freeze on spending.

To stop all but statutory spending in the midst of this crisis would be irresponsible – people would suffer. Until the immediate crisis has passed, local government is being held over a barrel, with central government holding the purse strings and calling the shots.

This is not just penny pinching, it is playing with people's lives – and it demonstrates a horrendous lack of trust in local government.

The Prime Minister has reassured the nation: austerity is over. But for local government, there is no money.

SOCIAL CARE

The limits of muddling through for council finances

By Andy Pike | 12 October 2026

Andy Pike looks at England’s local government finance crisis and why incremental fixes must give way to sustainable funding reform.

SOCIAL CARE

Local government audit: Rebuilding assurance is a more arduous job than clearing the backlog

By Iain Murray | 12 October 2026

Rebuilding local audit assurance is essential to financial resilience, accountability and public confidence, says Iain Murray.

SOCIAL CARE

Councils: Commissioners need to be the very last resort

By Heather Jameson | 08 October 2026

'The question is how to get local government back to the days when intervention was the exception and finances were not fudged', says Heather Jameson.

SOCIAL CARE

Liverpool's recovery: how a council moved beyond intervention

By Heather Jameson | 08 October 2026

Liverpool City Council has shed its final improvement notice and emerged from intervention five years after government commissioners were brought in. Chief e...

Heather Jameson

Popular articles by Heather Jameson

-->