Title

SOCIAL CARE

Paying the price for Government's mixed messages

In a 'killer blow' Jenrick has issued his caveat, says Heather Jameson. The Government will only pay for the ‘specific tasks’ it has handed down in relation to COVID-19. 'This is not just penny pinching, it is playing with people’s lives', she adds.

When historians judge the Government's response to the coronavirus crisis they will, quite rightly, focus on the human cost. The soaring death rates – with all the devastation, grief and loss that brings – will be examined.

The Government guidance, delays to lockdown and the farcical distribution of PPE will all be in the spotlight.

It is doubtful that local government finance will take centre stage in the history books but the latest missives from communities secretary Robert Jenrick are likely to have a devastating impact on the UK's people and economy for years – if not decades – to come.

Central government's mixed messages on local government funding have not just been chaotic, they have been catastrophic. Go back just a few weeks and the lines were clear. ‘Whatever it takes'.

Privately, ministers reassured: if you are close to financial collapse, come to us.

Local government was handed the responsibility to look after its communities – it is what the sector is there for. Now, in a killer blow, Mr Jenrick has issued his caveat. The Government will only pay for the ‘specific tasks' it has handed down.

That means no support for lost income. No funding for further pressures on services – from social care, to domestic abuse, to protecting those with lost income. No cash to support the local economy, rebuild town centres, create growth, jobs and skills. The list of costs – after a decade of cuts – is endless.

So surely this means a raft of s114 notices – councils declaring themselves to be out of cash. There may be threats, but here's the rub: a s114 is not just raising the flag on your finances, giving in on trying to balance the books; it is a freeze on spending.

To stop all but statutory spending in the midst of this crisis would be irresponsible – people would suffer. Until the immediate crisis has passed, local government is being held over a barrel, with central government holding the purse strings and calling the shots.

This is not just penny pinching, it is playing with people's lives – and it demonstrates a horrendous lack of trust in local government.

The Prime Minister has reassured the nation: austerity is over. But for local government, there is no money.

SOCIAL CARE

Building trust, capacity and accountability in England's strategic authorities

By Sandy Forsyth | 04 June 2026

To address the complexities in the evolution of strategic authorities, devolution needs to work beyond the traditional metro mayoral model, says Sandy Forsyth.

SOCIAL CARE

What England can learn from Japan's approach to local government finance

By Naoki Fujiwara | 04 June 2026

Consideration of Japan’s approach to local government funding suggests possibilities for doing things differently in England and opens up space to think abou...

SOCIAL CARE

Neighbourhood Guarantee: Can councils deliver the visible improvements residents want?

By Ben Page | 03 June 2026

Ben Page says the Government's Neighbourhood Guarantee focuses on the everyday services residents notice most. But without sustained investment, engagement a...

SOCIAL CARE

Finding a NEET solution

By Tom Stannard | 02 June 2026

The interim report of the Milburn Review revealed the stark reality of youth unemployment. Tom Stannard explains how Manchester is supporting people into emp...

Heather Jameson

Popular articles by Heather Jameson