Title

DEPARTMENT FOR LEVELLING UP, HOUSING AND COMMUNITIES

People matter more than places

Until we stop obsessing about the process of place and begin to reconnect meaningfully with people where they live, we won’t change anything, says Donna Hall.

The latest national health and care policy contained within the NHS Long Term Plan and other Government policy guidance comprises a plethora of embryonic spatial footprint structures and concepts that rely on the key role of ‘place' in transforming health and care.

These include PCNs (Primary Care Networks), ICPs (Integrated Care Systems), STPs (Sustainability and Transformation Partnerships), BCF (Better Care Fund) and that is just some of the health and care bit.Could we be in danger of drowning in a sea of confusing and disparate piecemeal ‘place' initiatives and missing the point of place and people (not just as patients) at the beating heart of our local neighbourhoods and our communities?

At the same time we have the eagerly anticipated devolution White Paper and the possible reorganisation of local government. Place-based strategies are being developed separately by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG), NHS England and other Government departments. Maybe what we need is an integrated plan for place; starting with the person, their family, their neighbourhood, their town, their sub-region?

All of these centrally but separately designed initiatives are created with the aim of encouraging local innovation. However, what we can end up with is a set of shiny new partnerships, sometimes with new money attached, overlaying the same old responsibilities and loyalties.

Sometimes we need to simply make the time to take a step back and get back to basics. It's the ‘so what?' question. What actual difference will this reconfigured service make for our local communities in their day-to-day lives? Have we designed it with them? Does it address the issues that people and families face and the reality of how they live their lives?

There are many case studies of how small grassroots neighbourhood community and voluntary groups, especially mutual aid groups during the COVID-19 pandemic, worked day and night to improve the health and wellbeing of people struggling with shielding, mental health issues, social isolation, loneliness, bereavement, loss of employment and social status, domestic violence and family breakdown.

And yet we tend to focus on reshaping and reorganising the deckchairs of our formal paid healthcare and other professionals and the legal structures and contractual arrangements of health and care while it is the social fabric of communities that needs our investment and support.

We also know in our hearts that place will be pivotal in the implementation of the new NHS People Plan.

How we remodel and make our health and care workforce more flexible will depend on what extent we work with local councils, the police, schools and other local public services to develop a place-based workforce and system rather than an organisational values-based development plan.

We have all experienced the layers of professionals from different organisations and disciplines often descending often in an incoherent fashion on households who need our seamless support.

We know from all the international evidence and from Hilary Cottam's Radical Help that this way of working is the only way we will transform public services and rebuild communities for the better. We also now know the essential role of adopting a place focus to public health and epidemiology from all the evidence we have seen during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Social care could be moving into the NHS but local government knows the best examples of high quality social care for older people and for adults of working age are rooted in person-centred, place-based partnerships with local third sector partners and charities. Do we need to nationalise social care or do we need to localise the NHS?

Until we stop obsessing about the process of place – delivering separate Government strategies in isolation from each other, organisational sovereignty, commissioners v providers and the strange dance of the annual contracting cycle –and partnership governance can begin to genuinely and meaningfully reconnect with the public and the places they live in on our public service reform journey we won't change anything.

Professor Donna Hall CBE, is chair of the New Local Government Network (NLGN) and chair of Bolton NHS Foundation Trust

@ProfDonnaHall

DEPARTMENT FOR LEVELLING UP, HOUSING AND COMMUNITIES

Community insight must shape the next phase of neighbourhood health

By Sophie Cloutterbuck | 02 November 2026

Meaningful community engagement can help councils tackle health inequalities and improve neighbourhood health outcomes, says Sophie Cloutterbuck.

DEPARTMENT FOR LEVELLING UP, HOUSING AND COMMUNITIES

Listen before you fail

By Mark Fletcher-Brown | 02 November 2026

Mark Fletcher-Brown offers his six-point guide to helping leaders avert disasters by ensuring they hear the things they don’t want to.

DEPARTMENT FOR LEVELLING UP, HOUSING AND COMMUNITIES

When a software flaw becomes a council wide concern

By Mark Brett | 02 November 2026

Following the discovery of vulnerabilities within the PHP programming language, Mark Brett looks at how local government leaders can strengthen cyber resilie...

DEPARTMENT FOR LEVELLING UP, HOUSING AND COMMUNITIES

Local government reorganisation and devolution: Where is the Government's bigger picture?

By Pete Robbins | 02 November 2026

Fiscal levers, strategic geographies and simpler local structures are a genuine piece of the jigsaw, but the Rewiring the State White Paper has to paint a mu...

Donna Hall

Popular articles by Donna Hall

-->