LOCAL DEMOCRACY

A bandwagon that won't stop rolling

The arguments for creating large unitary authorities have not been developed in an evidence-based way, say Steve Leach and Colin Copus. How can the persistence of ‘reorganisation by stealth’ be explained?

When the Queen's Speech was delivered in October, the attention of the local government world focused on what it contained that might affect its future. The answer was ‘not a lot'. But it did give further momentum to the unitary bandwagon, which was kick-started by the Banham Commission appointed in 1992 and taken further by the shambolic bidding process initiated by Labour in 2006.

This process paused under former local government secretary Eric Pickles between 2011 and 2016, but again resumed momentum with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) approving proposals for unitary reorganisations in Dorset, Northamptonshire and Buckinghamshire and a move to create two ‘super districts' in Suffolk.

Popular articles by Colin Copus

SUBSCRIBE TO CONTINUE READING

Get unlimited access to The MJ with a subscription, plus a weekly copy of The MJ magazine sent directly to you door and inbox.

Subscribe

Full website content includes additional, exclusive commentary and analysis on the issues affecting local government.

Login

Already a subscriber?