PUBLIC HEALTH

Conquering vaccine hesitancy

Emily Morrison looks at the results of a comparative UK-USA study of vaccine engagement to find out if a community engagement approach can improve take-up rates and build trust.

COVID-19 has undoubtedly been polarising. People's experiences of the pandemic have varied dramatically, as some have benefitted from greater control over their own destiny than others. While some have been able to speak up for what they want and need from their working patterns, and have a say in what their local neighbourhood and services should look like, many have not. Discriminatory structures mean certain vulnerabilities, skills, experiences and losses are valued – while the claims and experiences of others go unheard. These inequalities have shaped the uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine.

At the Institute for Community Studies, our latest research, delivered with the US-based Institute for Community Research, is a new UK-USA collaborative study that examines vaccine engagement through the voice and experiences of local leaders involved in its delivery, and highlights the importance of tapping into local knowledge in efforts to improve vaccine take-up. Understanding vaccine hesitancy through communities of place, funded by the British Academy, the Social Science Research Council, and the UK's Science and Innovation Network in the USA, explores levels of vaccine engagement in four locations: Oldham and Tower Hamlets in the UK, and Boston and Hartford in the USA.

Popular articles by Emily Morrison

SUBSCRIBE TO CONTINUE READING

Get unlimited access to The MJ with a subscription, plus a weekly copy of The MJ magazine sent directly to you door and inbox.

Subscribe

Full website content includes additional, exclusive commentary and analysis on the issues affecting local government.

Login

Already a subscriber?