HUMAN RESOURCES

Are your flexible working policies fair?

Chief executives want people back in the office, but that brings challenges to the modern workforce. Director of recruitment at Osborne Thomas Natasha Hilton-Keane explains why reviewing working policies is now more important than ever.

The ongoing and raging debate regarding flexible working reached a bit of a hiatus in August with chief executives of big organisations such as Amazon, Meta and Zoom all insisting they want their employees in the office two/three days per week; some even issuing threats if their employees don't comply.

They are not alone; we know local authority chief executives, members and leadership teams – in the majority – want the same thing. And we know there is sense in this view.

Local authorities are significant employers who, due to their central office locations, contribute enormously to local economies – shops, restaurants, leisure facilities, and so on. Others argue those employees who can work flexibly versus those who can't because they are frontline workers isn't fair; those in IT and HR who work purely remotely getting a particularly negative rap here. Further views include working purely in isolation as having a negative effect on our wellbeing, and that the knock of effect is we have forgotten how to interact and engage with others.

But what do our employees want? Recently published figures by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development report that 12% of the UK's workforce (4 million people) changed their job in the last year due to lack of flexible working. And 71% of the working population cite flexible working as being very important to them – it enables them to balance their lives more easily in what is becoming a far more demanding and fast moving world. For us as executive recruiters, the first question we are asked by prospective candidates is what is the flexible working policy?

Added to all of the above is the equally ongoing and raging debate regarding productivity and whether home working enhances productivity levels or reduces them. We know what chief executives, members and leadership teams might say and we know what workforces might say.

So, what do we do with this growing divide between employers and employees in what is an already challenging period when it comes to retaining and recruiting your best talent? And is there a way to please both sides?

A positive of what we have been through over the past few years is that we had time to experiment and test the waters. In sheer, and understandable, panic we started by shutting ourselves away behind firmly bolted doors. As regulations slowly softened, and after close-on a full year, some of us found ourselves cautiously heading back into the office maybe one day per week. For some that became two days, others three days; the determination of which exactly being down to the jobs we did, and, more likely (let's be honest), our personal preference. Many have dug their heels in when it comes to set days to be present in the office, saying: ‘We are very comfortable at home thank you'.

As we begin our journey towards the end of 2023, is now a good time to be reflecting on our learnings and reviewing what works for ‘all' of us (with a nod to ‘fairness')? It is probably time for some of us – both organisations and the workforce) to take a bit of a clearer call on our flexible working practices and what they really look like.

Some organisations have adopted hybrid as the balance to being fair – for example some days in the office, others at home. It supports organisational goals, it gives employees balance, and our local economies are positively embraced.

Of course, this model needs consideration and creativity for those frontline workers who by the very nature of the work they do are frontline. What can we do to make them feel better about fairness? We can't assume that we know – so why not ask them?

Some organisations have done this and they have been surprised by some of the responses; regular social gatherings, better street lighting, more ‘time out' breaks, just examples. It's not always about the money, it's about time with each other, with family, and so on. These can easily be incorporated into working practices and they create a feeling of being listened to, understood, responded to, and considered. Any ‘unfairness' goes away and is replaced by more positive actions and outcomes.

Reviewing working policies is now more important than ever. The market is moving at an extreme rate, changes are becoming the ‘norm' and we need to play catch up quickly to ensure the best talent is retained and attracted

Natasha Hilton-Keane is director of recruitment at Osborne Thomas

This article is sponsored content for The MJ

HUMAN RESOURCES

Competitors warm up for the LG Challenge 2025

By Virginia Ponton | 23 December 2024

Michael Barrett and Virginia Ponton set the scene for the LG Challenge 2025, when 10 participants will test their skills and ingenuity on five real-life chal...

HUMAN RESOURCES

Starmer 'acutely aware' of SEND risk

By Dan Peters | 23 December 2024

Prime Minister Keir Starmer is ‘acutely aware’ that demand and market failure across special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) services are pushing c...

HUMAN RESOURCES

Is the 'stick'-led approach in planning reform the best strategy?

By Ben Standing | 23 December 2024

New planning rules feature a heavy presumption in favour of development, but Ben Standing argues we must also engage communities to ensure local people feel ...

HUMAN RESOURCES

New Towns: A checklist for development and delivery

By Katja Stille | 23 December 2024

Katja Stille looks at how New Towns can effectively support local authority housing delivery.

Popular articles by Natasha Hilton-Keane