Title

LOCAL DEMOCRACY

Local government does a brilliant job in elections

Ben Page 'cannot ever recall a UK election 'like the one Americans are currently fighting over'. He says it is 'sometimes worth remembering just how efficient and effective British local government is'.

After a few days of watching the American elections, I am starting to feel rather patriotic, partly because the UK polls performed much better than the American ones in both May and December last year; Ipsos MORI's average error for each party in December was only 0.3%. The Brits therefore may have learned their lessons from 2016, whereas Americans seem to be repeating them. But I am proudest of the brilliant job local government does in British elections.

Our system just seems to work. Although we count elections locally, they are all run on the same countrywide basis. So, no local variation on voter registration, on who's eligible for a postal vote, or when postal votes are counted, or on verification for postal voting, or on how results are announced. In contrast, the variation in the US system has been very confusing and clearly damaged the credibility of US democracy (helped too by Trump's antics of course).

We know that state-controlled laws on voter registration have been used as vote suppressants in outrageous way – with all sorts of tests designed to trip up poor black voters. The fact that elected state officials, who stand on party slates, oversee elections in the US provides plenty of opportunity to those who want to cause mischief. In contrast, in the UK, elections are overseen by independent local authority officials who are consistently excellent. While issuing running vote tallies as votes get counted provides transparency, they allow some to erroneously argue that fraud is taking place. In contrast, given the result is only announced once in the UK, after all the votes have been counted, I cannot ever recall an election like the one Americans are currently fighting over.

It made me think that the electoral count teams of Sunderland and Newcastle, who vie to produce the fastest count in the UK, should get on a plane and go and help out. Their commonsense approaches – like using bank tellers to help with the count – might make all the difference.

While we look at America's divisions, and see our own reflected back, it is sometimes worth remembering just how efficient and effective British local government is, and also, just to cheer us up, that our politics remain far less divided than the Americans'.

Ben Page is chief executive of Ipsos MORI

@benatipsosmori

LOCAL DEMOCRACY

How Knowsley transformed adult social care for residents

By Sarah Smith | 03 November 2025

Knowsley has grappled with health inequalities and complex social challenges. Now, through its ambitious ‘One Council’ approach – focused on early interventi...

LOCAL DEMOCRACY

Sunderland leads UK Smart City revolution and tech growth

By Patrick Melia | 31 October 2025

Embedding connectivity infrastructure into the very fabric of urban life can ignite the conditions for rapid and transformative economic growth. For smart ci...

LOCAL DEMOCRACY

Counting the cost of local government failure

By Heather Jameson | 30 October 2025

Reflecting on the bailout figure announced by the Government as it unveiled plans for two new unitaries in Surrey, Heather Jameson says the alternative to co...

LOCAL DEMOCRACY

Adding up the price of local government interventions

By Dan Peters | 30 October 2025

As more councils in intervention increases, the price tag for commissioners is skyrocketing. Dan Peters crunches the numbers and commissioner Gavin Jones exp...

Ben Page

Popular articles by Ben Page