Title

PUBLIC HEALTH

Public health budget slashed by a quarter, charity reveals

A charity has warned against cuts to public health as an analysis reveals that austerity under Conservative governments has hit the poorest the hardest.

A charity has warned against further cuts to public health budgets as a new analysis reveals that austerity measures under successive Conservative governments have hit the poorest areas the hardest.

The Health Foundation issued the warning alongside the publication of the charity's new analysis that found that the public health grant has been cut by 24% on a real-terms per capita basis since 2015/16.

The cut falls more heavily on those living in the most deprived areas of England, who also tend to have poorer health, according to the charity.

In Blackpool, for example, the most deprived local authority in the country, the per capita cut to the public health grant has been one of the largest at £42 per person per year.

The reduction in funding for the public health grant affects some services more than others, the charity's analysis reveals.

Stop smoking services and tobacco control, for example. have seen the greatest real terms fall in funding, with a 41% reduction. There have also been significant real terms reductions for drug and alcohol services (28%) and sexual health services (23%).

The charity said that a whole-government strategy to improve health and reduce health inequalities is ‘desperately needed'.

Jo Bibby, director of health at the Health Foundation, said: ‘The UK is in the midst of an economic crisis that has significant consequences for the nation's health. As the Government scrambles to balance the books ahead of the fiscal plan, there are worrying signs that public services could face further cuts.

‘Any more cuts could have long-lasting impacts on people's health and further entrench health inequalities. There is a 19-year gap in the number of years a girl born in the most deprived 10% of areas can expect to live in good health compared with a girl born in the least deprived areas.

‘Opportunities to prevent the early deterioration of health are being missed. If the Government fails to fund vital preventive services, people's health will continue to erode, and the costs of dealing with this poor health will be felt across society and the economy.'

PUBLIC HEALTH

Restoring the third pillar of local authority finance: citizen investment

By Karl Harder | 23 April 2026

Karl Harder looks at the benefits of citizen investing.

PUBLIC HEALTH

Rethinking the Better Care Fund

By Mark Palethorpe | 22 April 2026

Moving integrated care from rhetoric to reality calls for an urgent review of how resources like the Better Care Fund are structured, governed and deployed, ...

PUBLIC HEALTH

Is income tax assignment a step change in English devolution?

By Mark Sandford | 22 April 2026

Kevin Muldoon-Smith and Mark Sandford say assigning a share of income tax locally could strengthen incentives for long-term, place-based strategy, but intern...

PUBLIC HEALTH

How we delivered the Youth Investment Fund in Blackburn with Darwen

By Imran Akuji | 21 April 2026

Delivering the Youth Investment Fund in Blackburn with Darwen required a deliberate shift in the council’s role from lead applicant to system steward, says I...

Popular articles by William Eichler