CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE

Residents unlikely to prioritise public health

How would you like to shave £200m from your public health budgets before next April? Ben Page looks at the issues.

article-author
By Ben Page | 12 August 2015

How would you like to shave £200m from your public health budgets before next April?

Should the amount taken from authorities' reflect differing local achievements and progress, or just be a flat 6% reduction within this financial year?

Ben Page

Popular articles by Ben Page

  1. Decent funding matters more than structure
  2. Leaders must be dealers in hope
  3. Starmer will now need to face down housing activists
  4. As ever the challenge will be execution

SUBSCRIBE TO CONTINUE READING

Get unlimited access to The MJ with a subscription, plus a weekly copy of The MJ magazine sent directly to you door and inbox.

Subscribe

Full website content includes additional, exclusive commentary and analysis on the issues affecting local government.

Login

Already a subscriber?

Ben Page

Popular articles by Ben Page

  1. Decent funding matters more than structure
  2. Leaders must be dealers in hope
  3. Starmer will now need to face down housing activists
  4. As ever the challenge will be execution
footer-logo

©2024 Hemming Group Limited. Registered in England and Wales. Registered No: 490200. VAT number GB342 023 408