Title

WHITEHALL

Trio drop out of flagship fund

Three local authorities have now dropped out of the Government’s flagship Housing Infrastructure Fund (HIF), it has emerged.

Three local authorities have now dropped out of the Government's flagship Housing Infrastructure Fund (HIF), it has emerged.

Homes England, the Government's housing agency, confirmed that bids for Essex CC's Colchester Braintree Borders garden community, Suffolk CC's strategic highways works east of Ipswich and London's regeneration of Old Oak have all been withdrawn.

The councils walked away from receiving ‘forward funding,' which had been due to be targeted at large, strategic and high-impact infrastructure projects aimed to ‘unlock' new homes in the medium and longer-term.

Two other successful bids – £29.4m for Rutland CC's St George's Barracks garden village and £14.7m for Leicestershire CC's Melton Mowbray southern distributor road - have yet to finalise contracts almost four years after the fund was first announced.

One reason for projects failing to get across the line – cited by some Rutland councillors - could be the wide-ranging pre-contract conditions imposed by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) – such as for funding to have been drawn down by the end of 2024.

This led Rutland to reject the cash, with one councillor warning the council would be financially liable and ‘risked bankruptcy' if the scheme could not be completed by the deadline.

An evaluation scoping report for the Government, published last month, warned: ‘If local authorities are not able to complete these pre-funding activities there would be a risk that funding will never be made available.'

Shadow minister for housing and planning, Mike Amesbury, said: ‘Like so many of this government's housing promises, the HIF is shaping up to be a promise the Tories couldn't deliver.

'The £5bn HIF is the latest poorly-designed policy, which is now unravelling.'

In an essay collection for think-tank Localis last year, chairman of the Local Government Association's housing board, Cllr David Renard, called on the Government to ‘expedite payment of outstanding HIF allocations, relax conditions so that councils can focus on delivery, and extend deadlines and flexibilities on completion timescales'.

MHCLG has described the HIF, which originally awarded funding to 34 local authorities, as an ‘integral part of measures to facilitate increased housing supply'.

WHITEHALL

Future Forum Midlands: 'Conceptual chance' of meeting housing targets

By Ann McGauran | 12 September 2025

The Government’s new housing targets ‘are a better balance across the country’ with ‘a conceptual possibility’ they can be met, Birmingham City Council’s hou...

WHITEHALL

Fair Funding Review 2.0 and the road to reorganisation

By Tracy Bingham | 10 September 2025

Councils will have to grapple with risks, resilience and reform as they balance the fallout from fair funding with the challenge of reorganisation, writes Tr...

WHITEHALL

Rethinking long-term community investment

By Nick Kemp | 10 September 2025

As the UK Shared Prosperity Fund ends and the Growth Mission Fund and trailblazer neighbourhoods emerge, Nick Kemp explores how councils can embrace adaptive...

WHITEHALL

From national ambition to local delivery

By Tom Newman-Taylor | 10 September 2025

Tom Newman-Taylor says the East Midlands Freeport is driving clean growth, investment and job creation as local government, the Mayor and national partners a...

Dan Peters

Popular articles by Dan Peters