LOCAL DEMOCRACY

Virtual meeting challenge dismissed by High Court

Councils will not be able to continue to meet virtually after 6 May after High Court judges dismissed a legal challenge by local government.

Councils will not be able to continue to meet virtually after 6 May after High Court judges dismissed a legal challenge by local government.

The Association of Democratic Services Officers (ADSO), Lawyers in Local Government (LLG) and Hertfordshire CC launched a judicial review after the Government refused to extend emergency legislation to allow virtual meetings beyond the 6 May deadline.

In a hearing last week, they argued councils could use existing powers to meet remotely. It would remove the need for primary legislation, which the Government claims is not possible.

However, judges have now ruled a ‘physical presence' is needed for remote meetings under existing legislation. They claimed: ‘The decision whether to permit some or all local authority meetings to be conducted remotely… involves difficult policy choices on which there is likely to be a range of competing views.'

Those decision, they concluded, ‘are for Parliament, not the courts'.

ADSO chair, John Austin, said he was ‘extremely disappointed' with the judgement. The situation Councils now find themselves in is untenable and I call on the Secretary of State to back up his support for our claim and legislate quickly, as Governments have in Wales and Scotland,' he said.

President of LLG, Quentin Baker, added: ‘I'm confident that we have paved the way for Government to legislate and LLG will be working closely with ADSO to assist the secretary of state to deliver that outcome.'

Local Government Association chairman, Cllr James Jamieson, also voiced his disappointment. ‘Councils by law, have to hold annual meetings within 21 days following local elections, so many will now have to use very large external venues to allow all members of the council to meet in person,' he said.

Even communities secretary Robert Jenrick has publicly announced he is in favour of virtual meetings, despite the Government's claim there is no room for primary legislation.

Following the announcement, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: 'We are grateful for the efforts of councils to ensure meetings could continue remotely over the past year.

'Councils will need to return to face-to-face meetings after 6 May and should continue to prepare accordingly.' 

LLG and ADSO have vowed to continue to lobby for legislation to be brought forward quickly to amend the rules and allow councils to meet virtually.

There is currently a government consultation on the issue underway.

Jackie Weaver makes the case for virtual meetings

LOCAL DEMOCRACY

Woking's debt hits £2.1bn

By Dan Peters | 20 November 2024

Woking BC’s commissioners have revealed its ‘spiral of debt’ has reached £2.1bn and further intervention is needed, with capitalisation not providing a ‘sust...

LOCAL DEMOCRACY

Mayors and the devo dilemma

By Mark Sandford | 20 November 2024

Mark Sandford sets out the arguments made for and against mayors, and looks at ways to shift the balance of power between metro mayors and the council leader...

LOCAL DEMOCRACY

Soaring London rents blamed for declining agent offering

By Dan Peters | 20 November 2024

Properties offered to member councils by a social lettings agent owned by London boroughs have plummeted by more than 90% in two years.

LOCAL DEMOCRACY

MPs sound alarm on SEND deficits

By Martin Ford | 19 November 2024

Deficits in SEND (special educational needs and disabilities) budgets are among the top concerns for the Public Accounts Committee (PAC).

Heather Jameson

Popular articles by Heather Jameson