HEALTH

So, what happens when the political calculations around levelling up change?

Recent events threaten to disrupt the flagship levelling up agenda we were told would be nothing short of system change for how the country is governed, says Jessica Studdert.

Levelling up is primarily an electoral strategy. Some might claim it as the most ambitious attempt to address deep-rooted regional inequality we have seen for years.

But its inspiration was less moral outrage at the injustice, more a rational objective to speak to a new post-Brexit coalition of voters in Red Wall seats.

So, what happens when the political calculations change? Recent events threaten to disrupt the flagship agenda we were told would be nothing short of system change for how the country is governed.

Since the White Paper's publication in February, the cost of living crisis has consumed an increasing proportion of that precious Westminster resource: bandwidth. Amid the need to be seen to be doing something, ideally something quick and free, the supposedly cross-government levelling up missions are proving fragile. The headline-grabbing gesture to delay the planned ban on junk food promotions easily won out over the core commitment to reduce the gap in healthy life expectancy by 2030.

With the rhetorical focus on maintaining their inroads into Labour's heartlands, the Conservative party's own base has shown signs of being rattled when given the chance to vote. The Chesham and Amersham by-election loss to the Liberal Democrats was blamed on Government plans to enable more housebuilding. In response, the move to enshrine levelling up sits uncomfortably in the same Bill alongside measures to level down planning reform ambitions, directed at traditional rural Tory voters.

There were more signs of Southern discomfort in this month's local elections, as the Conservatives lost notable ground in London and the South East. As we approach a General Election, it remains to be seen how tough the levelling up mettle really is.

There is a chance that, as Labour plays defence and the Tories play attack in key Northern seats, we could see an arms race on levelling up ambitions from both main parties that actually produces some meaningful policy progress into the next Parliament. But there is equally a risk that the lure of a more transactional retail offer is all too enticing, and we are left with nothing more than a few shiny new buildings beyond 2024.

Jessica Studdert is deputy chief executive of New Local

@jessstud

HEALTH

Nutrient neutrality: A unique and major restriction on the home building industry

By James Stevens | 29 August 2024

The Government has yet to announce its plan to address nutrient neutrality, ‘but the truth is that home builders should never have been saddled with the prob...

HEALTH

Picking up the pieces

By John Cooper | 14 August 2024

Ann McGauran looks at the underlying issues that have spurred on a host of violent protests across the UK, and ponders what steps the sector can take moving ...

HEALTH

Appetite for construction

By Jonathan Werran | 29 July 2024

Jonathan Werran ponders whether the Labour Government’s headline-grabbing housebuilding proposals will ultimately achieve their goals

HEALTH

Local government is at least creeping up the agenda

By By Adele Taylor | 24 July 2024

After the King's Speech the sector still needs to work together with a collective voice that ensures the department name change actually means something, say...

Popular articles by Jessica Studdert