Title

FINANCE

Council tax is a regressive tax - it's time to do something

With a tax based on 1991 property values, the decks are firmly stacked against a sector that is already facing a cliff edge in 2020, writes Jo Miller.

As all of the organisations concerned with local delivery of vital public services – the LGA, SOLACE, CIPFA, ADASS, ADCS, ACC, DCN, SIGOMA etc, it is time for a concerted, collective campaign on future funding for local services.

It is not enough to rely on repatriation of business rates – itself an outdated property tax which fails to reflect the modern dot.com. gig economy era.  council tax too, if it is to survive, must be made fit for purpose.

That we are employing people to translate property values back to 1991 – over a quarter of a century ago – is beyond belief.

The amount of money that council tax raises is directly proportionate to the yield of band D properties. So those areas with, historically the highest preponderance of band A properties and lowest preponderance of band D will raise the least council tax. Compare and contrast Ealing and Doncaster, two similar sized Councils. Ealing had 122,983 chargeable properties, which equals 130,084 band D properties. Doncaster, with a similar number of chargeable properties (121,932) has an equivalent of only 93,797 properties because 87% of properties are below the average band D property.

So, we have removed RSG, and are instead relying on an outdated property tax (business rates, where SME's face a huge comparative burden in contrast to corporate multi-nationals), and regressive council tax. The decks are stacked against those with the highest preponderance of low yield properties. When one looks at what 1% of council tax per head of population yields between councils, as The MJ analysis shows, the gap is stark.  Little or no attempt is made to recognise need, or indeed the ability of people to pay taxes.

This is not a redistribution argument, so local government in its various different forms does not need to argue with itself, allowing Government to divide and conquer.

We are talking here about the funding of basic provision of services in all of our communities. It cannot be right that the funding of such basic services is left entirely to what can be raised locally on a random basis. If you have historically low council tax, and lower value properties, life is particularly tough.

There is no long-term plan, no solution in sight, the 2020 cliff edge gets closer every day, and those stacked decks stack more every day. Isn't it time to do something?

Jo Miller is president of the Society of Local Authority Chief Executives and chief executive of Doncaster MBC

FINANCE

Bringing skills from the private sector into a council isn't simply a career shift

By Libby Caulfield | 26 March 2026

Moving to local government after a 10-year career in consultancy, Libby Caulfield was warned the pace was slow and transformation impossible. She found the r...

FINANCE

Peering into the future of Total Place

By Ann McGauran | 24 March 2026

National policymakers and local system leaders gathered at a convention to look at how place-based public service reform can go further and faster. Ann McGau...

FINANCE

A rocket booster has been fired under the tax devo debate

By David Phillips | 23 March 2026

Letting combined authorities benefit from a share of income tax revenue growth could encourage a bigger focus on skills and might be a stepping stone to part...

FINANCE

Fiscal devolution would give mayors crucial levers over tax and spend

By Andrew Carter | 23 March 2026

Andrew Carter says that to guarantee cities’ autonomy and mark what the Chancellor calls a ‘genuine break with the past’, metro mayors will need to reduce th...

Popular articles by Jo Miller