Title

ECONOMIC GROWTH

Levelling up resembles a jigsaw of disparate 'pieces of policy'

Arianna Giovannini says there is a consistent lack of clarity about what levelling up means - and it also remains unclear what areas should be 'levelled up'. The Government needs to develop a clear vision and strategy for the long-term, she adds.

Now Brexit ‘is done', levelling up seems to have become the Government's new flagship policy for 2021. On paper, this sounds like good news. In practice, a number of issues cast doubts on whether rebalancing our deeply unequal economy will turn into reality.

The first obstacle is a consistent lack of clarity as to what levelling up actually means. Within the Government itself, different departments seem to prioritise different approaches. Some see investing in large infrastructure projects as the best way to turn the fortunes of so-called ‘left-behind' areas. Others have used more nebulous concepts such as ‘improving life chances', while those sticking to more orthodox economic narratives argue the main focus should be to ‘improve productivity'.

It also remains unclear what areas should be ‘levelled up'. ‘Left-behind' places do not correspond to a simple North-South dichotomy and are not characterised by the same set of socio-economic dynamics. This means it's hard to agree on the metrics that capture what or where left-behind areas are and can reflect any actual progress on the levelling up agenda.

While evidence shows that over-centralisation is the root cause of regional inequalities, the Government continues to propose measures that are essentially run from the centre – as reflected in the recent debates over the allocation and management of the UK Shared Prosperity Fund. This, together with the further postponement of the English devolution White Paper to a date ‘towards the end of the year', suggests the centre will continue to hold a strong grip over the levelling up agenda.

As a result, levelling up resembles a jigsaw of disparate ‘pieces of policy' that do not fit into an overall, coherent picture. The Government needs to develop a clear vision and strategy and come up with a long-term policy agenda that leaves asides party political needs and focuses on measures that benefit all people and places. It should be built on consistent and interconnected priorities. Investing both in physical and social infrastructures to boost the economy, while improving quality of life and real devolution of power to the subnational level, would be a good starting point.

Dr Arianna Giovannini is deputy director of the Local Governance Research Centre (LGRC) and associate professor/reader in local politics and public policy at De Montfort University

@AriannaGi

ECONOMIC GROWTH

Financial reform cannot wait

By Owen Mapley | 18 February 2026

Owen Mapley says the finance settlement provides breathing space for many authorities – but this is not the same as financial resilience.

ECONOMIC GROWTH

The visitor levy needs to be the start of a more grown-up approach to growth

By Simon Kaye | 17 February 2026

The visitor levy should be the start of a new relationship between local and central government, writes Simon Kaye.

ECONOMIC GROWTH

The local outcomes framework comes with risks

By Ian Miller | 17 February 2026

Ian Miller says the local outcomes framework is a tool to allow Whitehall to intervene and he is concerned it could be used in future to channel resources.

ECONOMIC GROWTH

Local government finance settlement leaves sector divided

By Martin Ford | 17 February 2026

The most controversial local government finance settlement for years has divided the sector. Martin Ford looks at the fallout.

Popular articles by Arianna Giovannini