Title

HEALTH

COVID-19: A lesson from Italy

Dr Arianna Giovannini says that while Italy's approach to tackling COVID-19 is not perfect, its model 'can have a much more positive effect on policy decisions and crisis management than centralised, place-blind responses'.

Italy was the first European country to enter national lockdown in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak and was, for a while, one of the nations that was hardest hit by the pandemic. However, after a few first months of real struggle, the spread of the virus has been effectively contained through a concerted effort that has involved all levels of Government. Sadly, the same cannot be said for England.

In Italy, local and regional authorities have constitutional protection and there are several permanent committees that provide forums for regular and constructive dialogue between central and subnational government representatives. There is also clear distribution of power, responsibilities and funding across levels, and local and regional governments have a wide range of direct competences, including on health.

Collaboration, dialogue and subsidiarity are the foundations of the relationship between central and local authorities. To be sure, in the context of the pandemic there were times, especially at the early stages, when central Government had to intervene directly and made decisions on regional and local matters. However, as the country adapted to the ‘new normal', co-operation, autonomy and local leadership were reinstated. As such, while consultations and sharing of information/data takes place regularly with central Government, regional bodies work in earnest with local authorities in the day-to-day response to the pandemic – with responsibilities on testing, contact tracing, data, monitoring, prevention, and health and care provisions. Through negotiations with central Government, they also develop ‘regional security protocols' tailored around local characteristics/needs – acting as point of guidance and contact for businesses, workers and civil society, while also providing a clear, unequivocal messages to local communities.

This is not to say the Italian model is perfect. Mistakes were made by central Government and mayors along the way. And yet, there's one very important lesson we can learn from Italy: co-operation, co-ordination, consistent communication, mutual trust and diffused leadership can have a much more positive effect on policy decisions and crisis management than centralised, place-blind responses.

Dr Arianna Giovannini is deputy director of the Local Governance Research Centre and associate professor/reader in local politics and public policy at De Montfort University

@AriannaGi

HEALTH

Using system-wide reform to put Bucks families first

By Errol Albert | 13 November 2025

Buckinghamshire Council is delivering system-wide reform through locality teams, Family Hubs and a partnership-led Families First approach, as Errol Albert e...

HEALTH

Social care reform: Stopping profit extraction in services

By Rosie Maguire | 12 November 2025

Introducing a major report on UK social care, Rosie Maguire highlights how fairer commissioning and funding may already be within our reach.

HEALTH

Navigating procurement complexity during reorganisation

By Martin Ford | 11 November 2025

Crucial to making a success of local government reorganisation is the management of myriad contract arrangements among the authorities involved. Martin Ford ...

HEALTH

Putting the sector in the Budget driving seat: The Budget councils deserve

By Simon Christian | 06 November 2025

Simon Christian says that while a Budget that reflects councils’ responsibilities and the urgency of the challenges ahead is vitally needed, this must be mat...

Popular articles by Arianna Giovannini